TAX REFORM OR TAX FRAUD??? CLAIM: TAX “Reform” will lower the personal income tax rate to 6 1/2%, from the current 8 1/2% REALITY: By eliminating the tax deduction for property taxes and health care expenses, the new rate is REALLY 8% - and the new law eliminates indexing also - so your taxes will automatically go up every year with “bracket creep”. And the new taxes include “Elimination of the minimum tax credit for individuals that may be claimed on returns due for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010” which automatically raises your income taxes $150! CLAIM: “87% of Maine taxpayers will see a decrease in taxes”. "REALITY: Every person making less than $19,000 a year will see an INCREASE in taxes." MOST homeowners and people paying for their own health insurance making less than $70,000 a year with see an increase in taxes. People with older cars, or who cannot cook much at home will see an increase in taxes. (Of course, people making more than $250,000 a year will see some tax relief. Until the legislature raises taxes again"2010???" CLAIM: TAX “Reform” is revenue neutral, i.e., does not raise overall taxes "REALITY:" This is really a Tax INCREASE . The Legislature got rid of indexing and reduced the standard deduction for Mainers. This will increase Maine taxes $50 million. YOU CAN BET YOUR BOTTOM DOLLAR that next year (AFTER the ELECTION, of course), when a $ BILLION DOLLAR hole is "found" in the state budget, IF the spenders who passed this bill are still in office, they will raise the Income Tax again by “adjusting” the credits. Democrat leaders will have achieved their purpose - BAIT & SWITCH.. Here is a PARTIAL LIST of the new taxes under this bill (SORRY, BUT IT TAKES 4 PAGES JUST TO LIST THE BULK OF THEM): Meals & Lodging, Prepared Food Tax Changes
• 8.5% tax (up from 7%)
• 8.5% tax (up from 5%) on candy
Car Rentals (less than 1 year)
• 15% (up from 10%)
Telephone Service
• 5% (up from 0%) on residential long distance calls
• 5% (up from 0%) on pre-paid cards
TAXABLE SERVICES @ 5% Installation, repair, maintenance
"Installation, repair or maintenance services" means all services involved in the installation, repair or maintenance of
• jewelry
• cameras
• guns
• musical instruments
• electronic and mechanical equipment
• lawn and garden equipment
• computer hardware
• office equipment
• vehicles
• appliances
• tailoring
• clothing
• shoe repair
• furniture repair and restoration
• service and maintenance contracts
Amusement, entertainment, recreation
Tickets to
• theaters
• movies
• lectures
• concerts
• amusement parks
• water parks
• fairgrounds except for licensed agricultural fairs
• race tracks
• carnivals
• circuses
• sports activities
• stadiums
• amphitheaters
• museums
• planetariums
• animal parks
• petting zoos
• aquariums
• historical sites
• convention centers
Admission fees for exhibition shows such as
• auto
• boat
• camping
• home
• garden
• animal
• antique shows
Scenic and sightseeing excursions including
• aircraft
• helicopter
• balloon
• blimp
• watercraft
• railroad
• bus
• trolley
• wagon rides
*Whitewater rafting and guided recreation.
Entertainment services such as those provided by
• bands
• orchestras
• disc jockeys
• comedians
• clowns
• jugglers
• children's entertainers
• ventriloquists
Proceeds from arcade games
Personal property
"Personal property services" means the
following services related to personal property
• dry cleaning
• laundry and diaper services
• not including self-service laundry
services
• embroidery and monogramming
• car washing
• pressure cleaning and washing
• pet services such as
• exercising
• sitting
• training
• grooming
• boarding for nonmedical purposes
• picture framing
Domestic services, including
• house cleaning
• furniture and rug cleaning
• interior decoration
• meal preparation
• butchering
• art restoration
• warehousing and storage, including
• rental of storage units and
warehouse space, but not including warehousing and storage services provided to a business.
• moving services
• vehicle towing
• boat mooring
Transportation and courier services.
"Transportation and courier services" means instate transportation of persons or property by
• taxicab
• limousine
• courier services
. Wake up and SIGN the People's Veto and VOTE THIS DOWN! Professor John Frary of Maine is a scholar, patriot, gourmand and curmudgeon and Board Member of Maine Taxpayers United as well as a former US Congress candidate and retired history professor, and an associate editor of the International Military Encyclopedia. and can be reached at: jfrary8070@aol.com ********************************************************************************************************
TORTURE, American Style
I assume that everyone understands the politics of the torture debate. The Democrats see an opportunity to seize the moral high ground by comparing Republican wickedness with Democratic sensitivity and humanity. The hardcore left sees the torture issue as another weapon with which to condemn the War of Terror, along with profiling, wiretapping, border security, rendition, military commissions, Gitmo detention, bombs, bullets and weapons in general.
Generally, they detest anything that compromises the moral purity of the United States. Never mind that leftward writings on American history typically assert that American history is an unbroken record of misogyny, racism, imperialism, colonialism, genocide, brutality, and capitalist exploitation. Patriots must take pleasure in their belated discovery of our precious heritage of moral grandeur.
The relevant passage in international law defines torture as any act by which "severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person." United States law adopts this definition in prohibiting torture. So the CIA lawyers ask the Office of Legal Council to, in effect, define "severe." The OLC lawyers produce a rather comical list of permissible techniques of coercion, e.g., you can bitch-slap your prisoner upside the head but you mustn’t punch him with a closed fist. These methods of coercion are delicately term "enhanced interrogation" techniques.
The liberals and leftists aren’t buying this. If they recognize any form of coercion as acceptable they have not taken the trouble to disclose it. We would be putting words into their mouths if we said they believe that interrogation must be gentle and reassuring, a form of therapy intended to relieve the prisoners of any form of stress which might constitute mental suffering. We simply don’t know what they consider suitable methods of interrogation. They decline to define.
And they are not content to condemn torture as morally indefensible. They insist on having it both ways by asserting the torture, er, "enhanced interrogation" is ineffective because the information gained is unreliable.
Sure it is. And so what? There is no form of intelligence-gathering which is guaranteed reliable. There are disinformation techniques for them all. We know that the rule in the French Resistance was that if the Gestapo took one of their operatives they had just 24-hours before he told the tale in full. It is enough to condemn the Gestapo as a pack of merciless sadists. No need to characterize them as incompetent bunglers as well.
Col. Leo Thorsness who experienced a great deal of torture in North Vietnam has some expertise on the subject and I’m inclined to accept his judgment over that of the usual agitated wind-bags. I quote: "Torture, when used by an expert, can produce useful, truthful information. I base that on my experience. I believe that during torture, there is a narrow "window of truth" as pain (often multiple kinds) is increased. Beyond that point, if torture increases, the person breaks, or dies if he continues to resist."
Thorsness and Bud Day don’t consider waterboarding torture. John McCain does. It looks like torture to me. Torture or not, Colonel Thorsness has this to say: "If I were to catch a "mad bomber" running away from an explosive I would not hesitate a second to use "enhanced interrogation," including waterboarding, if it would save lives of innocent people."
Senator Schumer (D-NY) concurs. He had this to say on tape (you will find it on the Internet) during a hearing of the senate judiciary committee on June 8th, 2004. "I think there are probably very few people in this room or in America who would say that torture should never, ever be used, particularly if thousands of lives are at stake. Take the hypothetical: If we knew that there was a nuclear bomb hidden in an American city and we believed that some kind of torture, fairly severe maybe, would give us a chance of finding that bomb before it went off, my guess is most Americans and most senators, maybe all, would say, Do what you have to do."
Advocates of American moral purity condemn this. For the sake of clarity they should specifically state how many American lives they are willing to sacrifice for their high ideals—a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand? Their unwillingness to do so exposes their moral posturing for what it is.
So what can we conclude? It will be odious and destructive to make torture a national policy. We are unwilling to deliberately sacrifice lives in defense of a legal or moral principle. Perhaps we can only hope that we have responsible officials who are willing to do the dirty at the risk of prison or dismissal when it is necessary; and that they will be allowed to get off with light sentences and their pensions.
Not a very satisfactory, much less absolutist, resolution is it? Damn, there must be some way to escape the real world.
Professor John Frary of Maine is a scholar, patriot, curmudgeon and Board Member of Maine Taxpayers United as well as a former US Congress candidate and retired history professor, and an associate editor of the International Military Encyclopedia. and can be reached
at: jfrary8070@aol.com
|
From the "Can this possibly be real" desk...
Martin Charges Frary with Ethics Violation
The State Ethics Commission will hold a hearing on January 29th in Augusta on an ethics charge filed by John Martin, former Speaker of the Maine House, against Republican congressional candidate John Frary on Halloween eve. The charge claims that Frary’s radio and print ad “The Three Amigos”, which linked the incumbent Mike Michaud to Governor Baldacci and Mr. Martin, was an attempt by Frary to defeat Mr. Martin in the recent election, in which he ran unopposed.
The satirical radio ad, which can be heard at www.fraryforcongress.com , stated that Martin, Baldacci and Michaud were “The Three Amigos of the North Maine Woods”, and that the policies advocated by the three men in tandem were directed at enriching themselves while “Maine’s economy burns”.
Martin, who was unopposed in his election, claims that the ad was directed, in part, at electing his opponent. Baldacci was not on the ballot, and was not a clean elections candidate in 2006. Michaud, and all federal candidates, have no clean election option.
“This is astonishing”, said Professor Frary. “The legal advice I have received to date is that if this concerns something I did in my Congressional campaign, then the legal response is simple: the Commission has no jurisdiction over federal candidates. Black letter law. Simple and straight forward. I invite all my friends to attend the hearing. I wouldn’t miss it for the world.”
The Hearing before the State Ethics Commission will be Thursday, January 29th, at 9AM at the Public Utilities Hearing Room, 242 State Street in Augusta. It is open to the public.
Hear the offending radio ad for yourself:
Click here for a copy of the letter detailing the "charges". Astounding! Please note: the radio ad was created gratis by unpaid volunteers working for Professor Frary's campaign. Perhaps John Martin is so venal and corrupt that he cannot conceive of citizens donating their time and effort to elect an honest man to Congress. Radio stations were compensated for their air time and some, allegedly, enjoyed it!
|
| Dear
Readers,
A brief note wishing you a Happy New Year and my thanks
for your support. If I did not deliver the victory we
hoped for, I hope I won and retain your respect.
I recently ordered a book by Prof. Fred Kaplan, The
Biography of a Writer. about the writings and speeches
of President Lincoln. I am particularly struck by his
judgement that in contemporary political discourse "a
use of language that respects intellect, truth, and sincerity
has largely been abandoned."
Just yesterday a stranger approached me in the Farmington
Hannaford’s to thank me for "telling it like
it is." This is happening pretty regularly and I
take more pride in this than I would in an electoral victory
based on evasions, mendacity and elusive promises.
I’m not claiming that there is any Gettysburg Address
in me and I acknowledge that my style of writing is not
to everybody’s taste. But I can claim that the style
is my own, that I spoke the truth as I have understood
it and that I showed respect for the intelligence of my
readers.
Our contemporary political culture is taking us along
the same path as the European welfare states, a path that
leads to inevitable social and fiscal disaster. There
is no need to debate this. Future developments will resolve
the question.
I doubt that they can avoid this fate. I believe our Republic
may yet succeed in steering away from it. If the State
of Maine can alter its course, then so can the United
States. It is clear that in 2010 flights of chickens will
be coming home to roost in Augusta—along with turkeys,
vultures and do-do birds. There can be few gimmicks left
to shoo them away at last.
At present I am working for Lance Harvell’s victory
in the special election to replace Janet Mills here in
Farmington. This will not alter the balance of power in
the Maine House, but a decisive win will point the way
to a reversal of party fortunes two years from now.
Persistence, eternal persistence, is the lot of those
determined to arrest the aggrandizement of government.
The forces that drive that aggrandizement can never be
extinguished.
In the end it is not a question of victory. It is a question
of duty.
Again, my thanks and best wishes for a Happy New Year
for you and yours,
John Frary
PS - Next week my spies will report
to you on the race for governor. Stay tuned! |
 |
|